5th Congress Autism-Europe
Articulos / Proceeding
Autism-Spain

NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL BASES OF THE DELACATO METHOD OF NEUROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF AUTISTIC PEOPLE

A. Parķsi, A. Buonomo, A. Apreda, P. Iaccarino, S. Martone

Team 1 of the Delacato & Delacato Center, Naples, Italy

The validity of therapeutic patterns for any morbid process concerning human beings is closely connected to the etiopathogenesis of the morbid process.

Autism is a clinic pattern caused by a brain injury that affects one or more of the sensory channels in one of the following ways: hyper; hypo. The changes for hyper or hypo depend on where the injury occurs. All of the symptoms of autistic syndrome are simply a consequence of the fact that autistic children's brains are injured (they often have very small injuries). The injuries make them perceive inputs from the world differently from not injured brains (1).

This apparently reductive theory has to be linked to a recent finding in the field of neuroscience to which Delacato's studies have contributed. This finding shows that the nervous system is based on the functional organization of neurons of which it is made up, and on the distribution of their axons and dendrites that form nervous nets.

Developing neurons are like thousand million spiders weaving webs whose main wefts are carried out following a fixed project (genetic programme) but their single threads depend upon neurons and on the countless and complex sensory stimuli they receive (environment factor) (2).

This means that brain development is not completely programmed in the genes of neurons but it also depends on environmental or epigenetic factors (combinatory theory). The farther we go in the phylogenetic range the more this is true, that is why it finds its greatest expression in human beings.

The genetic programme of man gives information in order to build up neuronal circuits but only the sensory inputs mould the brain by helping to make neuronal maps (3).

When the brain gets messages of environmental stimuli in one of the following ways: hyper or hypo, the neuronal maps develop abnormally. The brain, then, will organize itself irregularly and the child will behave in an anomalous way.

Autistic syndrome may exhibit apparently different symptoms and this because they are the result of combinations of 1) what sensory channels are affected; 2) which alteration (hyper or hypo) they suffer from; 3) how much irregularly this anomaly has moulded the brain (Neurological Organization).

The Delacato Method, also known as Method of Neurological Organization (4), is a neurorehabilitative method. At the present time it represents the most effective therapy to treat autism(5) .

Its effectiveness is due to two characteristics of nervous system: 1) the nervous system organizes itself continuously; 2) this neurological organization, which is at the highest in the early years of life, is possible because neurons keep their plasticity all their life long.

Neurons are the anatomic component of the grey matter of encephalon. They use an electric code and a chemical code for their functions (receiving, processing, memorizing, transferring stimuli). Some diseases of nervous system are due to an alteration of these codes.

Autism is a consequence of the most different causes of brain injuries (6). Therefore, this clinic pattern is sometimes based on an anatomic alteration of neurons and sometimes on the alteration of the codes that neurons use. This second possibility explains why scans, such as CAT scan and NMR in autistic children may be within the standard, whereas EEG always shows an alteration, even if it is not specific.

Hubel's experiments on the visual system of cats have definitively proved (7) that neuronal nets need to function (to receive inputs); the only anatomic integrity not being enough. Then, it has been shown that growing nerve fibres follow fixed pathways but the fine and final modulation in the making of circuits depends entirely on the sensory stimuli.

The Neurological Organization is therefore the outcome of the combination of genetic and epigenetic factors. Sensory inputs (visual, gustatory, tactile, auditory, olfactory) are able to leave their imprints on brain tissues (8). Such sensory inputs stimulate and in time support the development of specific nervous pathways, while others fall out use.

Some scientists have compared developing brain with a road system that evolves with use. The streets with little traffic may be left out, the busy ones may be enlarged and, if necessary, new streets may be built.

Environment stimuli get to the brain through sensory channels. As the brain is made up of neurons endowed with plasticity it organizes itself in reaction to such stimuli.

The plasticity of neurons can be defined as the ability of neurons to modify at first their metabolisms, then their shapes and finally their functions depending on the sensory stimulation they have received, that is to say, on their use (8).

After all we can state that the request for function from neurons that environment and other neurons make regulates metabolic activity first and then the shapes of neurons (plasticity) (9).

As the shape of the neuron is responsible for its function, what C. H. Delacato maintains in his clinical observation is thus demonstrated scientifically: function makes structure and the structure in its turn helps to keep that certain function better.

References

1) Delacato C.H. The Ultimate Stranger, Novato, California, Arena Press., 1974

2) Calissano P. Neuroni, Milano, Garzanti Editore, 1992

3) Edelman G. M. The Remembered Present, New York, Basic Books, Inc., 1989

4) Delacato C.H. Neurological Organization and Reading, Charles C. Thomas,

Springfield, Illinois, 1973

5) Delacato F.D., Szegda D.T., Parisi A., Neurophysiological View of Autism:

Review of Recent Research as it Applies to the Delacato Theory of Autism,

Brain Dysfunction, Karger,1994

6) Bauman M., Kemper T. L. Histoanatomic observations of the brain in early

infantile autism, Boston, Neurology, 35, 866, 1985

7) Hubel D. H. Eye, Brain and Vision, New York, Scientific American Books,

1988

8) Kandel E., Hawkins R. Apprendimento e individualią, Milano, Le Scienze,

1992

9) Aoki C., Siekevitz P. La plasticiąį del cervello, Milano, Le Scienze, 1989